1. […] I weirdly conflated “♥” and “ME” leading to that bizarre travesty of simultaneously reserved and affectionate self-identification.  The more I look at it, the more it looks like a bird barfing up an E.

    […] I weirdly conflated “♥” and “ME” leading to that bizarre travesty of simultaneously reserved and affectionate self-identification.  The more I look at it, the more it looks like a bird barfing up an E.

     
  2. OBSESSIONS IN ARBITRARY METRICS
When the trend is upward (or at least toward mastery,) the time spent on procrastinatory neuronal exercises is slightly less shameful. 
Slightly.
At the current point in time, if I complete one piece per evening, I will be done the work I have planned just in time for the exhibit.  (So I have plenty of time to ruin a good trendline, right.)  I am 50 arbitrary units away from having robot hands!  ROBOT HANDS!  I should go out with people.  I’ll get there.
ROBOT-HANDS-ME WOULD LOVE CYBER-HOTDOGS.  Love. Terrifying.

    OBSESSIONS IN ARBITRARY METRICS

    When the trend is upward (or at least toward mastery,) the time spent on procrastinatory neuronal exercises is slightly less shameful. 

    Slightly.

    At the current point in time, if I complete one piece per evening, I will be done the work I have planned just in time for the exhibit.  (So I have plenty of time to ruin a good trendline, right.)  I am 50 arbitrary units away from having robot hands!  ROBOT HANDS!  I should go out with people.  I’ll get there.

    ROBOT-HANDS-ME WOULD LOVE CYBER-HOTDOGSLove.
    Terrifying.

     
  3. Plays: 10

    [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

    …Those days are fever days and you sweated them away.  You’ll never know what oceans of work you lost because you were moping! (Moping in your unmade bed! Always moping!…)

    -Proof (2005)

    New alarm-clock sound?  It is alarming.  Like a bullet shying past one’s head.

    (This weekend, this movie was watched and the CFD slidedeck was adjusted instead of the work getting finished.  [Such passivity requires the passive voice.]  And then today I overslept. [Active.]  The bullets are getting closer.  Not in the slides.)

     
  4. There are many highly respected motives which may lead men to prosecute research, but three of which are much more important than the rest. The first (without which the rest must come to nothing) is intellectual curiosity, desire to know the truth. Then, professional pride, anxiety to be satisfied with one’s performance, the shame that overcomes any self-respecting craftsman when his work is unworthy of his talent. Finally, ambition, desire for reputation, and the position, even the power or the money, which it brings. It may be fine to feel, when you have done your work, that you have added to the happiness or alleviated the sufferings of others, but that will not be why you did it. So if a mathematician, or a chemist, or even a physiologist, were to tell me that the driving force in his work had been the desired to benefit humanity, then I should not believe him (nor should I think the better of him if I did). His dominant motives have been those which I have stated, and in which, surely, there is nothing of which any decent man need be ashamed.
    — 

    From “A Mathematician’s Apology”.

    I think I am close to a conclusion on the philosophical churn of the last weeks.

     
    In my house we call him Juanito Cash.

     
  5. ***

    Here is a secret, which you should never tell her. 
It is a point of Salieri-level agitation for my little sister that I have “perfect pitch”.  This was reported to her while I was in college by our former mutual piano teacher and reiterated by the music teacher she kept in touch with from our elementary school and the violin teacher in our school district, the latter of whom noted it as a negative thing, because it aided my (in retrospect, incredibly stupid) policy of not practicing as much as I should have, and led to my consequent near-illiteracy where sheet music is concerned.  (Which comes back to why I would approach tablature with cautious intrigue.)  It is the focal point of fairly regular “why are you wasting your gifts doing science” conversations.  I hate those conversations, for an assortment of reasons.  But that is unnecessary context.

    The delicious secret truth is that I just have solid relative pitch and intermittent tinnitus, which happens to come in at around 440Hz. 

    I’m thinking of telling her as a birthday present.

    I have an oddly similar S-M relationship with an overseas scientist better who actually looks like Tom Hulce.  Tom Hulce who, despite having made this mental connection about before, I just learned did the voice work for THoND, which is extra weird as the scientist doppelgänger is the reason it is speculated that I have a scoliosis fetish.  (I would argue I just wanted to touch it—the it being his spinal protuberance—BUT less in a sexy way and more in the realm of taking advantage of an opportunity for tactile learning. I haven’t, and not just because I am extremely cautious about the etiquette and propriety of casual touching.)

     
  6. From “A Mathematician’s Apology” by G. H. Hardy

    A man who sets out to justify his existence and his activities has to distinguish two different questions. The first is whether the work which he does is worth doing; and the second is why he does it, whatever its value may be. The first question is often very difficult, and the answer very discouraging, but most people will find the second easy enough even then. Their answers, if they are honest, will usually take one or other of two forms; and the second form is a merely a humbler variation of the first, which is the only answer we need consider seriously.

    (1) ‘I do what I do because it is the one and only thing that I can do at all well. I am a lawyer, or a stockbroker, or a professional cricketer, because I have some real talent for that particular job. I am a lawyer because I have a fluent tongue, and am interested in legal subtleties; I am a stockbroker because my judgment of the markets is quick and sound; I am a professional cricketer because I can bat unusually well. I agree that it might be better to be a poet or a mathematician, but unfortunately I have no talent for such pursuits.’

    I am not suggesting that this is a defence which can be made by most people, since most people can do nothing at all well. But it is impregnable when it can be made without absurdity, as it can by a substantial minority: perhaps five or even ten percent of men can do something rather well. It is a tiny minority who can do something really well, and the number of men who can do two things well is negligible. If a man has any genuine talent he should be ready to make almost any sacrifice in order to cultivate it to the full.

    *****

    My talk went well, but the philosophical churn continues.

    (Source: math.ualberta.ca)

     
  7. image: Download

    (The Seaward Is Not An Option.)
Not just everyday people have doubts.
(I like this far more than I should.)

    (The Seaward Is Not An Option.)

    Not just everyday people have doubts.

    (I like this far more than I should.)

     
  8. I wish I could say that Curious Giorgio and the Infinite Discoteca was a result of a cold medicine or some such, but the fact of the matter is it was an idea that was soberly conceived in an airplane bathroom (the mile-high clubhouse!) last week and birthed at my desk while waiting for a crane to cease its looming over my laboratory causing safety to lock us out of the whole corridor.  LOOMING!

    I should think the fluid dynamics papers (or even the postcards from tattooine/papyrus stuff,) were a lock for “probably my best work this year”, but my work as a powerpoint* ranger makes a weirdly compelling last minute case for itself sometimes. 

    (*Technically this is Keynote based.  It could have just as easily been a powerpoint file.  Determination of “the best tool” is mostly based on capability and proximity.  Mostly.  My laptop was right here.)

    Some less disorienting variation of CGatID would probably appear in the cutaway view of my “undivided attention”, c.f.:

    …just so you know.

    (Source: vimeo.com)

     
  9. Plays: 0

    [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

    I wish I had a button that would just play that lady’s voice.

    (It is actually not my favorite use of that phrase, as Dean Stockwell’s “SAY WHAT?!” in Battlestar Galactica was decidedly more epic in scale and ridiculousness. That one EARNS the interrobang in transcription.)

     
  10. image: Download

    AND, he’s the guy behind “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”. 
One doesn’t have to agree with his every hypothesis to be SEETHING with professional jealousy. The science isn’t so much the answers as the questions in the process.  The art speaks for itself.

    AND, he’s the guy behind “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”. 

    One doesn’t have to agree with his every hypothesis to be SEETHING with professional jealousy. The science isn’t so much the answers as the questions in the process.  The art speaks for itself.

     
  11. There are many sentences on the wikipedia page for Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo that I like.  I also think the simplified parse tree of that sentence is on the borderline of incorrect; in as much as while “Buffalo” is a proper noun, it is being used adjectivally: the capital letter is just a red herring.  I should have herring for dinner.  I shouldn’t have had that second cup of coffee.  And I want to blame the coffee for this sinking feeling, but I know that’s not it.  That is not it at all.

    “I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker…and in short, I was afraid.”

    “Simplify your complicated linguistic constructs.” 
    That is the primary note I get.  From La in 1997, from ERW in 2011.

     
  12. Percentage of my day I spent pointing at my reflection and saying “SABOTEUR!”: 4.68.  The day is still young!  Which I mean only to imply that it’ll go down!  The percentage!

    During one such pointed heart-to-mirrored-heart moment, I realized what had been missing from my recent work-playlist as the proposal that I have been struggling with for weeks continued to go unfinished.  AND THEN, I remembered the existence of the video on the left.  So I switched monitors to look it up.

    And then, around 1:40, I remembered “Fat Lee” and the noodles quip from before one of the best scenes in all of sciencey fictiony TV when the Galactica drops out of the sky and it is ridiculously awesome.  Ohman.  I feel like the guy who used to write TWoP recaps for BSG had written something glorious enough that one of my eyes wept a little as I paused the video to laugh at a memory.  Not even a clear memory: a hazy memory of a pleasant feeling induced by someone writing years ago about television that I watched years ago. Not so long ago that it was live, but at least before I upgraded from the 2003 tivo.

    Anyhow, the point of that was I ALSO remembered exactly how much time I used to spend reading about TV on any given day (not even the watching: the READING about TV, lordy,) and was amused to find that, in that sense, I actually self-sabotage a little less now than then.  But not enough less.  Unless I stop.  For a little.  On the other hand, I heard that the network is going down here this coming weekend.  Maybe I’ll plug in the old tivo and be the old me, watch some of the best of 2003.  That’s what I’m going to look forward to now.  Looking forward to looking backward. 3 deep breaths and B2W. 

    Now is the time on Sprockets when we work.

     
  13. jimmymarks:

capnmariam:

[Something was quoted here, but I fail at proper referencing to myself all the time.]  

… I knew stuff about Morse code. 
And while those skills haven’t stayed, my love of befriending people I will never meet in real life continues. 
Case in point. 

 .—  ….  .-  -    -.  .  .-.  -..  -  .-  …  -  ..  -.-.    -.-.  —-  -.  …-  .  .-.  …  .-  -  ..  —-  -.  …    .—  .    .—  —-  ..-  .-..  -..    ….  .-  …-  .     —.  ..-  -.—    ..-.  .-.  —-  —    -  ….  .    ..-.  ..  …-  .    -…  -.—    ..-.  ..  …-  .    -.-.  ….  .-  -     .-.  —-  —-  —
So…I just like weird communication, cf. adventures with sign language, braille, cuneiform, whistled language, [redacted—ill timed quip about “morose” code] and so on.  I almost became an encryption person (wrong reference, but sort of related), but my fear of computers led to a dropped major.   Becoming a Ph.ake Doctor seemed a much better choice, where I could keep enigmas wrapped in riddles wrapped in vests, for personal entertainment instead of forcing myself to view them as “work” albeit with tasty machines.  I make other stuff instead and still occasionally play with robots, so it isn’t as tragic as it sounds.   
But, yes, the internet is a weird and delightful place.  I don’t, in fact, have a ham radio for probably the same reason I don’t have pets:  a Major Tom-like existence is probably a universal default for a certain kind of odd person if they don’t make the occasional awkward foray into meat-space.  Getting too comfortable is dangerous.
Anyhow.  See wikipedia: Major Tom.  (How neat is that?!)  That should be required reading.

    jimmymarks:

    capnmariam:

    [Something was quoted here, but I fail at proper referencing to myself all the time.]  

    … I knew stuff about Morse code. 

    And while those skills haven’t stayed, my love of befriending people I will never meet in real life continues. 

    Case in point. 

     .—  ….  .-  -    -.  .  .-.  -..  -  .-  …  -  ..  -.-.    -.-.  —-  -.  …-  .  .-.  …  .-  -  ..  —-  -.  …    .—  .    .—  —-  ..-  .-..  -..    ….  .-  …-  .    —.  ..-  -.—    ..-.  .-.  —- —    -  ….  .    ..-.  ..  …-  .    -…  -.—    ..-.  ..  …-  .    -.-.  ….  .-  -    .-.  —-  —-  —

    So…I just like weird communication, cf. adventures with sign language, braille, cuneiform, whistled language, [redacted—ill timed quip about “morose” code] and so on. I almost became an encryption person (wrong reference, but sort of related), but my fear of computers led to a dropped major.   Becoming a Ph.ake Doctor seemed a much better choice, where I could keep enigmas wrapped in riddles wrapped in vests, for personal entertainment instead of forcing myself to view them as “work” albeit with tasty machines.  I make other stuff instead and still occasionally play with robots, so it isn’t as tragic as it sounds.   

    But, yes, the internet is a weird and delightful place.  I don’t, in fact, have a ham radio for probably the same reason I don’t have pets: a Major Tom-like existence is probably a universal default for a certain kind of odd person if they don’t make the occasional awkward foray into meat-space.  Getting too comfortable is dangerous.

    Anyhow.  See wikipedia: Major Tom.  (How neat is that?!)  
    That should be required reading.

     
  14. image: Download

    
Career Paths in Same Family Tree Levels in Different Countries:A. Contemporary family tree level (i.e., siblings/cousins):C1:  Tending farm/fish/fowl, candyman, clergy, students.  C2:  Organic grocery, cosmetics sales, some students, engineers.C3:  VC, research scientist, trader/IB adviser (technically in C4), musician.B. Previous tree-level (i.e., uncles/aunts/parents)C1: Farmers, Local Governance/PermitsC2: Dentist, Oceanographer, Military Doctor, Neurologist, Engineer/BusinessguyC3: (1) Industrial Scientist, (2) ProfessorC. Previous Previous tree-level (i.e., grandparents)C1: FarmersC2: Banker, Nurse.C3: Null. (Immigration takes place in next level.)

Tonight’s Louie is pitch perfect.  Internationals LOVE ducklings.  (Sometimes for eating, but even then: loved right up to consumption.)No ducks were harmed in my visiting with the roof-ducks, 20110102.

    Career Paths in Same Family Tree Levels in Different Countries:
    A. Contemporary family tree level (i.e., siblings/cousins):
    C1:  Tending farm/fish/fowl, candyman, clergy, students. 
    C2:  Organic grocery, cosmetics sales, some students, engineers.
    C3:  VC, research scientist, trader/IB adviser (technically in C4), musician.

    B. Previous tree-level (i.e., uncles/aunts/parents)
    C1: Farmers, Local Governance/Permits
    C2: Dentist, Oceanographer, Military Doctor, Neurologist, Engineer/Businessguy
    C3: (1) Industrial Scientist, (2) Professor

    C. Previous Previous tree-level (i.e., grandparents)
    C1: Farmers
    C2: Banker, Nurse.
    C3: Null. (Immigration takes place in next level.)

    Tonight’s Louie is pitch perfect.  Internationals LOVE ducklings. 
    (Sometimes for eating, but even then: loved right up to consumption.)
    No ducks were harmed in my visiting with the roof-ducks, 20110102.